Dana Loesch suggests that Rand Paul anti-activist deserved beating, stating that she attacked or "lunged" at Paul, and until democrats apologize for two tea bags beaten months earlier that she could careless about "pretense"!
When is it ever OK for a man to premeditate too pummel a women, throw her down on the ground and then stomp her head with his foot?
When is it OK to call in bomb threats because a CEO fired a racist? (AKA Juan Williams).
In LEXINGTON, Ky. – Supporters of Republican U.S. Senate candidate Rand Paul wrestled a woman to the ground and one stepped on her head after she tried to confront the candidate in Kentucky.
Today, the Washington Post reports NPR received a bomb threat today, and while the threat didn’t specifically cite the Williams saga, NPR officials said the “tone” suggested it was involved:
NPR received a bomb threat Monday, five days after its decision to fire news analyst Juan Williams sparked a hugely negative reaction from the extremist tea baggers.
This is the very anger that lead Tea Bagger Dana Loesch incites.(only when politcal anger hits the right is it wrong).
Ms. Loesch (We use the term Ms. loosely) goes on her blog today and insinuates that this action is "eye for and eye" because fellow baggers Kenneth Gladney and Kelly Owens where attacked months earlier. Ms. Loesch goes on to explain "I’ve seen the tape of Valle vs. the Paul supporters. She was described as having “lunged” and “stalked” Paul, which, considering the history of leftist violence and threats (I know from experience: I’m preparing to go to court over threats made against my children, not to mention the death threat I received this week), made the debate attendees nervous."
Loesch in her demented FUBAR psyche tells readers how she knows Ms. Valle intent was to "go with the intent to start trouble".
Clearly, Dana Loesch is a idiot of profound epic proportions. She is titled "journalist", "political SME", and yet she barely holds a high school education!
NFTOS titles Loesch as a "muckraker", only difference is, she often applies half truths, biased skewed data, and literally knows little if anything about politics, policies, and or journalism! (http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2010/10/26/media-canonizes-paid-soros-activist-who-started-violence-at-rand-paul-debate/).
Glenn Beck has the "know nothings" drooling and seething on the ideology that two men run and manipulate America. (AKA George Soros and Drummond Pike.) Loesch is the epitome of a Beck and call girl zombie, and is baited by the repeated Beckster theme to tie anything to Pike and Soros, and hence the conclusion that "Ms. Valle is part of the Marxist, Communist regime set out to overtake America and attack half witted hillbillies running for office in Kentucky."
{Intent - Intent in law is the planning and desire to perform an act, to fail to do so (i.e. an omission) or to achieve a state of affairs in psychological view it may mean a different thing. In criminal law, for a given actus reus ("guilty act"), the required element to prove intent consists of showing mens rea (mental state, "guilty mind"). The requirements for the proof of intent in tort law are not simple. Knowledge of the repercussions of the act is often not necessary. It is sometimes only a matter of showing that there was desire to perform an act.}
Now we never expect Dana Loesch to understand law, but to say Dana that you know Ms. Valle's intent at the Rand Paul "Aqua Buhda" debate was to " incite a riot" is utter fecal matter and plain asinine. But this is the Loesch that we have come to know and love.
NFTOS has said this a million times if not once. And her it is again;
{Our researchers came up with this quote from a left wing friend of Loesch's (which honesty astonishes the bloggers of NFTOS that she has Democratic pals). Quoting photographer Steven Treusdell who has no problem calling out dear Dana... "You have the character of a hate radio DJ down pat," Truesdell wrote in an e-mail to Loesch in October. "Your continued rise in this arena will be fun to watch. You have the aggression, the looks, and the vocab to go far in 'Hate broadcasting' and right wing idolatry. Do be careful though, one day the outrage you urge in others will turn to violence and innocent people will die in your name. This is assured. That is a lot to live with, even when one has Religious righteousness and a fervent belief in their absolute rightness. I hope when that day comes you can live with the results of what you have sown."}
Now that Dana has gained nation attention with her buffoonery, she is now reaping the very outcome that Truesdell predicted some months ago. The anger she emits from a bull horn on courthouse steps, to the Larry King like bad breath she exudes when speaking into microphones, Loesch has yet to realize that anger, hate, politics has it's ramifications. The only thing Treusdell missed in his email or failed to mention and predict was that Dana might get some anger thrown at her as well while "inciting" the masses.
We at NFTOS despise any political violence, and we do not support the threats to Loesch, but in the same breath we are not surprised that some of her anger politics has now backfired and is now upon her. Freedom of speech has to be carefully monitored in politics circa 2010. Especially for the laymen like Loesch.
For Loesch to not admonish, denounce, repudiate, disassociate, condemn, rebuke, vituperate, any and all violence speaks volumes of the character that is Loesch.
To say
"If she didn’t want to be restrained she shouldn’t have gone with the intent to start trouble, but congressional members also need to provide their own security. Sure, the man shouldn’t have placed his foot on her head." Is a dominant male throwing a woman to the ground and foot placed on her head defined as "restrained".
Where does running for office say don't approach me or I'll "Black Water" body guard your ass?
Whether it's Kenneth Gladney, Kelly Owens or Ms. Valle, violence in politics is wrong Ms. Loesch! Period! Loesch's parting cutting quote to her readers goes like this, " So, forgive me if I vomit due to the pretense of devoted justice these same liberals now display I’m waiting for all the people who mocked and slurred Gladney and Owens to apologize and condemn their beatings. When the left can do that, then we can enter into a realm of legitimate, bi-partisan discussion. Until then, the left and government media can spare me the pretense."
If Ms. Loesch could only put two coherent sentences together on her "own", and not regurgitate something that has already been said by right wing extremism radio, blog and or Faux news, then and only then could anyone have that "legitimate, bi-partisan discussion" with her. Until Loesch gains a degree in something other than BS, NFTOS will have to repudiate the writings and mentality of the moronic, tomfool, nincompoop, muttonhead, ignoramus, cretin, imbecile, named Dana Loesch.
Footnote: Rand Paul dismissed the woman beater stating that he condones such actions.(Maybe Loesch should take lessons from her fellow hillbilly tea bagger)
A parting quote today from Michelle Bachmann (2x republican house seat running for Minnesota seat) said today on Glenn Beck. Quoting Bachmann " I plan to host classes on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights for fellow House members when I return to Washington so that freshman tea baggers know how to vote". WTF!
NFTOS
