17 Reasons Why Breitbart Is Not To Be Trusted

Everything You Don't Want To Be, "Andrew Breitbart"

Current TV's Keith Olbermann Pointing Out Andy Breitbart's Great Jouralism

Debunking Breitbart's "Occupy Rape List"

Quoting fellow blogspot blogger "St. Louis Activist Hub" Whom knows the Breitbart clan better than most:

"But what I think is so valuable about Olbermann's research is that it shows, quite dramatically, just how morally bankrupt the Breitbartian version of "journalism" really is. In basically every case, Breitbart bloggers twisted reality to fit their narrative. A real journalist would wait for conclusive evidence before declaring that some person or movement was responsible for rapes or sexual assaults; at Breitbart's sites, they throw out the charges almost daily based on their own interpretations of limited and ambiguous information. It's very much like the Kenneth Gladney case; the video was anything but conclusive; all it showed was Perry Molens pulling Gladney away from McCowan at the end of a fight. Yet Breitbart's gang of hacks declared that the video provided conclusive proof that McCowan and Molens had severely beaten Gladney, and they steadfastly refused to engage in an honest assessment of the evidence."

Why does Breitbart not defend himself on this blatant bullshit hyperbole? Why is it always that one of the useful idiots at "Big" - enter Lee Stranahan, - ends up cleaning Breibart's bowel movements, i.e. do his dirty work for him?

Well two reasons, one, money, like blood, is thicker than water, and coddling to the boss' ass is one way to ensure your still gainfully employed, second, it gives those the attention [ the "15 minutes of fame seekers"] that they normally wouldn't have gotten at home - because mommy failed to give them attention as a child. 

Comments on Stranahan's strory:

"Number sixteen: St. Louis. Again, the victim in an assault is identified as a member of Occupy, not the alleged perpetrator. ...

Woman assaulted AT Occupy. In her tent. That’s an Occupy related assault.

Wait – the assailant was homeless??! That changes … nothing."

Then why is Breitbart bellowing (drunkenly) AT Occupy to "STOP RAPING THE PEOPLE" when it's someone UNINVOLVED with the movement doing the alleged criminal activity?

For the love of Pete, Stranahan's logic is so warped and flat out dumb that he'd have to say that when that maniac killed the kids in Pennsylvania it was "Amish-related.

Like, seriously, gtfo."

Another:

"This whole thing makes a mockery of reasoning and is an insult to sexual assault victims.

"Related" is now repeatedly used as an excuse when previously it was used to condemn. Disgusting. The broadest definitions used to attach serious alleged crimes to a movement as if that group somehow isn't completely aware of, against, and actively preventing such activities. This is the foulest of narratives."

Another:

"The idea, pushed for months by these shameful websites, that the Occupy movement is somehow endorsing, advocating, oblivious to, or covering up alleged criminal activity has now been totally debunked. (Anyone could see it was complete bull from the start) Yet, instead of apologizing for this nonsense Lee Stranahan has taken all of an hour or so since Olbermann's piece to do some of his crack research to try to reinforce his shabby reporting (ie. narrative manufacturing).

Breitbart's bizarre and maniacal display at CPAC has at least served to draw attention to the lies he's been spreading about the Occupy movement.

Now he can go get some help."

 

Another:

"Wow, I was shocked to learn that all of the alleged sexual assaults were committed against Occupy protesters by outside individuals. We shouldn't be blaming the victims. Shame on Big Journalism. Shame on Dana Loesch. Shame on Andrew Breitbart. Shame on, whoever wrote this "debunking" article. Never heard of him before. Thank you Keith for setting the record straight.

You Breitbart people should feel really stupid right now. Keith destroyed you. Now, stop mass murdering people like you guys did in Seal Beach. One of your Tea Party psychos went on a killing spree and none of you have condemned that slaughter of human beings by a Teabagger. Shame on all of you for condoning mass murder!"

Another: Which is the most disturbing from the Breitbart asylum:

"For those still in doubt as to the nefarious nature of the Breitbart crew's despicable guilt by association attacks on the Occupy movement let me remind you of the time they attributed a murder to Occupy that actually occurred miles away and had nothing to do with it.
http://biggovernment.com/mikeflynn/2011/11/14/bre...
This disgrace was NOT retracted and is a perfect example of how the Breitbart people choose to "report" on incidents that might (if they manipulate them enough) fit their over-arching storyline. Just like the alleged sexual crimes used in Stranahan's list.

Gross."

 
Personally speaking, it's rare to see so many on this exclusive one sided/lop sided blog to have so many pointing out the obvious - that Breitbart and it's truthful fact finding bloggers (sarcastic) are providing CPR to the much needed faint heart beat of the teabagger society.

If you have posted in opposition at the "Bigs" site you get red warning flags like below, like its a bad thing. The red flags on Stranahan's post was larger than most, that is if not edited for content!

At our horseshoe meeting this am we where thinking, maybe, just maybe this blogger should stick to his "world renown photography training", for supporting Breitbart doesn't appear to be working so well for him!

Speaking of support, the numbers that despise and debunk Breitbart are a plethora, yet the only supporters in Andy's corner are Breitbart's "Big" gang, which at he end of the day, is both laughable and sad. But then again, liar, troglodyte, video manipulator, and teabagger are a cocktail that most sane American's will stay away from.

Ranting "rape", "freak" [whether on crack, the sauce, or sober] and other incendiary language for a "stunt" is disgusting! But this is the Breitbart we've come to know and love.

Breitbart's loathsome actions are sick enough, supporting his repugnant afterbirth is something straight out of Wikipedia's definition of Aleister Crowley!

How apropos, while visiting Breitbart's site I notice my anti-virus software "warning" me the "this site has potential dangerous and suspicious content"! I freaking love it, even McAfee knows slimy bullshit when they see it!

"this site has potential dangerous and suspicious content"

NFTOS
Editor-In-Chief
Roger West

Virginia's Version of "PERSONHOOD"

PERSONHOOD VIRGINNY STYLE

UPDATE: 2/16/12 13:28

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

"This isn't just a hard right turn. It's been a U turn to the right," said Sen. A. Donald McEachin, D-Henrico and chairman of the Senate Democratic Caucus. "Just look at what they've done: Drug-testing welfare recipients, clearly something that's got no basis in fact but meant to reinforce a stereotype. And those voter suppression bills, and the personhood amendment."

It’s clear that the Virginia GOP Legislature is willing to prioritize extreme legislation that could jeopardize human dignity and basic human rights! Personhood, its something that these Virginian's evidentially missed during high school educational classes.

Maddow Video Should Have All Americans Pissed Off, Not Just Virginian's: I am going to let Rachael's' video do most of the talking.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

**Maddow has promised us another section on this topic tonight -
once its posted we will publish as an update** West 2/15/12 17:50

I lied, see why this bill is just oh so wrong in oh so many, many ways:

Women in particular, me in general are sick and tired of old racist, radical, teapublican white men making law and decisions for women. Teaublicans say they want less government; but they don't mind government interfering with womens bodies, our homes and our bedrooms.

Personhood USA is a grassroots, Christian (sarcastic) organization founded to establish personhood efforts across America to create protection for every child by love and by law. Personhood USA is committed to assisting and supporting Personhood Legislation and Constitutional Amendments and building local pro-life organizations through raising awareness of the personhood of the preborn.

Who's The Person?

So that you understand teapublican "personhood":

“This bill requires every single code section in Virginia that uses the word ‘person’ to apply to a fetus,” said Del. Jennifer McClellan (D-Richmond), a member of the Courts committee. “That opens families and doctors to a wide variety of criminal and civil lawsuits for health care decisions not only in cases of unwanted pregnancies, but every pregnancy and even miscarriage."

 And why is this you ask?:

Let me be graphic here, whether you like it or not women, against your will, you shall have a " Forced Transvaginal ultrasound" on you in which: "Your fetus has fingernails … and we’re going to show them to you"!

" Forced Transvaginal ultrasound" is a type of pelvic ultrasound. It is used to look at a woman's reproductive organs, including the uterus, ovaries, cervix, and vagina. Transvaginal means across or through the vagina.

You will lie down on a table with your knees bent and feet in holders called stirrups. The health care provider will place a probe, called a transducer, into the vagina. The probe is covered with a condom and a gel. The probe sends out sound waves, which reflect off body structures. A computer receives these waves and uses them to create a picture. The doctor can immediately see the picture on a nearby TV monitor.

The health care provider will move the probe within the area to see the pelvic organs.

In some cases, a special transvaginal ultrasound method called saline infusion sonography (SIS), also called sonohysterography or hysterosonography, may be needed to more clearly view the uterus.

While conducting the test, the resulting images must be shown to the woman, even if she doesn’t want to see them, with the doctor pointing out salient details, like limbs, fingernails, and the heartbeat.

The woman retains the right to look away — but if she does, her eyes are likely to fall upon the result of further radical bills which - Require abortion signs in waiting rooms and consultation room that start off saying “Notice: It is against the law for anyone, regardless of his or her relationship to you, to force you to have the abortion.”

There’s a old piece on the Huffington Post — written by Dana Stone, who’s a doctor and fellow of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists — that does a good job of explaining why it’s egregious. For example: It forces women to have a procedure done that is not medically necessary (and since vaginal ultrasounds produce better pictures than abdominal ultrasounds in the early stages of pregnancy, this law would often require women to have additional medical instruments put inside them against their wishes). As such, it violates patients’ rights to refuse treatment or testing.

In most circles this "forcible rape" is called "the “Freedom of Conscience Act.” It is unclear whether they are referring to the doctors’ consciences (i.e., if you force the woman to have an ultrasound and she still wants an abortion, it’s not your fault) or the women’s (because clearly you must be free from a conscience if you decide to terminate a pregnancy).

Either way this Virginia bill is both disgusting and vile, and Virginian GOPers have sunk to a new low, a new low to which would even make Aleister Crowley proud!

I thought of proposing an alternate bill to these asshats in Richmond called the “Freedom to Not Have an Ultrasound Wand Stuck Up Your Vagina When It’s Not Medically Necessary and You Don’t Want It There” Act, and; there ought to be a bill titled, "if you can't bare a child, sit down and shut the f**k up!

NFTOS

Editor-In-Chief

Roger West

Breitbart Proves What We Knew All Along

Breitbart wins NFTOS' Coveted "Asshat" of the Year Award

This is an sequel to yesterdays blog. (see blog below this one)

"A Stunt"?! Andy Breitbart last night told The Young Turks, host Cenk Uygur that his rant was “a stunt to go over the mainstream media, to get people talking about the rapes.” (HUH)

Breitbart being.......Breitbart

In the second portiont of the interview, however, Uygur showed Breitbart several examples of the mainstream media covering the instances of rapes and sexual assaults at Occupy encampments. Breitbart tried to brush them off as “local media,” but Cenk gave examples from The Huffington Post, and one from ABC News that reported on the sexual assaults.

Breitbart explaining that this is all payback for what he calls the “smearing” of the Tea Party. This has been the recurrent theme of conservative coverage of the Occupy Movement, the reich-wing propagandists i.e. Big Journalism.

Bloggers like myself don't need to "smear" Breitbart and the likes, they do enough damage just by themselves. Might I suggest loosening the tin foil around your heads for starters!

Breitbart is playing games that I played as a kindergartner, which is exploiting those rapes to score points against a group (or groups) that he disagrees with. He doesn’t give a shit about the women who were raped! Breitbart’s rant wasn’t directed at Janeane Garofalo, or Keith Olbermann, or Bill Maher. It was directed at a crowd of Occupy protesters, which, statistically speaking, had to have included dozens of women who have survived sexual assaults.

Whether or not you believe that the assailants in these reports were from outside the movement (a point Breitbart didn’t dispute), the fact that he screamed “Stop raping people!” at a crowd that included victims of sexual assault is both vile and despicable, and belies any concern for these women. He called them “freaks” and “filthy animals.”

Just in case you missed the premeditated charade:

Sidebar: During Breitbart's 2012 CPAC rant, he revealed to the audience he had “videos” of Barack Obama from his college days. “I have videos, this election we’re going to vet him, “We are going to vet him from his college days to show you why racial division and class warfare are central to what hope and change was sold in 2008.”

More Andy:

“The videos are going to come out, the narrative is going to come out, that Barack Obama met a bunch of silver ponytails in the 1980s, like Bill (Ayers) and Bernadine (Dohrn), who said one day we would have the presidency, and the rest of us slept as they plotted, and they plotted, and they plotted and they oversaw hundreds of millions of dollars in the Annenberg Challenge and they had real money, from real capitalists. Then they became communists. We got to work on that. That is a parenthesis. Barack Obama is a radical, we should not be afraid to say that! Okay? And Barack Obama was launched from Bill and Bernadine’s salon. I’ve been there.”

Yes, more doctored videos from the most "prestigious film maker" of our time (Being extremely sarcastic). Thanks but no thanks dude, your reputation with videos doesn't say watch me with integrity.

Lets face it readers, Breitbart is many things, paranoid schizophrenic comes to mind, but more importantly he is a douche bag, the dirty rim around the inside of a toilet that hasn't been cleaned in three years, the maggot that thrives in your local landfill. I could careless whether this tool got his feelings hurt when the world called his party what they are -really, what ever happened to "sticks and stones"... I get threatened every day by Breitbart/Loesch followers, that's often the case when you blog for one side or the other.

Sidebar: I sometimes judge the impact I'm having on the world by the amount of hate mail or threats I get. It's a way of making something that could be disturbing into something positive.

Plus, they make for a great scrapbook. Or a lovely decoupage for the future grandkids.

I've always been surprised by people's need to contact others directly and threaten, demean, or attack them. It seems like a lot of effort for little return- but maybe I'm just lazy.

So imagine my surprise when I open my inbox daily to find myself deluged with over 30 nearly identical pieces of hate mail from different people around the country. Obviously I have pissed off some riech-wing follower of Breitbart, or better yet a website who sent the knuckle-dragging hordes after me. 

Breitbart is proof that words can cut and destroy far better than an weapon created. I have said often that "freedom of speech" is a dangerous tool when in the hands of those with minimal IQ. Enter Breitbart.

Andy, its early in the year, but NFTOS' staff is quite certain know one will top your repeated stupidity these last few days, so even with 10 months still to go in 2012, we proudly award you the coveted NFTOS "Asshat" of the year award. Congratulations Einstein! This would be two in a row for the "Big Journalism" tribe as Dana "Dive" Loesch won last years award.


NFTOS

Editor-In-Chief

Roger West

ANDY BREITBART, TEAPUBLICAN BOTTOM FEEDER

Liberals Favorite Fodder "Andy Breitbart"

In case you missed NFTOS' Saturday blog, here is your intro:

 Breitbart Losing Control



Aside from looking and sounding like a guy who was in the midst of a serious 2 week crack binge, Breitbart lecturing anyone on the finer points of ”behaving” themselves is like Newt Gingrich lecturing people about the evils of sex outside of marriage.

Andrew Breitbart has made a living on being an asshat, irritating liberals, and editing tapes to suit his purposes. He’s the patsy for the tea bag movement, and has a nasty streak that only Aleister Crowley could be proud of. And he demonstrated just how psychotic he can be last Friday outside of CPAC 2012. (Above video)

The problem with Britefart is that he is the barker, snake oil bottler, and show tent maker for the CPAC/teabagger freak show that is out there drooling and seething from Obama derangement syndrome.

Breitbart, has been a totally discredited blogger for a long time - and he thinks he is relevant just why? He keeps digging himself deeper and deeper into the cesspool - which is probably the best place suited for this grotesque ignoramus. Poor thing has no insight as to just how absurd he looks with the plethora of distortions, doctored videos, and his continued use of non factual comments. He is often pathological in nature (liar).

This isn’t the first time that Breitbart has said something controversial and outrageous. At a rally in Massachusetts in September, Breitbart incited violence against liberals and claimed the military would side with the teabaggers if a civil war were to ever occur between conservatives and liberals. (HUH?)

“I’m under attack all the time. They call me gay, there are death threats… There are times where I’m not thinking as clearly as I should, and in those unclear moments, I always think to myself, ‘Fire the first shot.’ Bring it on. Because I know who’s on our side. They can only win a rhetorical and propaganda war. They cannot win. We outnumber them in this country, and we have the guns… I’m not kidding. They talk a mean game, but they will not cross that line because they know what they’re dealing with. And I have people who come up to me in the military, major named people in the military, who grab me and they go, ‘Thank you for what you’re doing, we’ve got your back.”

Maybe he needs to put the crack pipe down long enough to see that the boogeyman is not out to get him. You can't make this shit up readers, I am thinking him and Loesch have tip toed through the tulips one two many times!


CPAC 2012 confrontation with teabgger Loesch and Breitbart, Loesch appears to be Breitbart's safety detail (sarcastic)




Breitbarts pejorative talk; anti this, anti that - it sounds to me like these two "journalist" (Loesch/ Breitbart) are auditioning for the Taliban.

Breitbart's "best of":

Breitbart Inadvertently Admits To Lying About Sherrod's NAACP Audience

 The Kenneth Gladney Charade Collapses

 Big Government Pushes State Department Gun Trafficking Myth

 Breitbart Blog Thinks James O'Keefe Invented Ambush Reporting

 Breitbart Editor Still Has Not Retracted False Claim About Murder At Occupy Savannah

 Breitbart Blogger Attacks Press For Claiming Perry Went Birther; Perry Doubles Down On Birther Rhetoric

 Breitbart Smear: Obama (And Thousands More) "Marched With" New Black Panthers

 Breitbart Calls Janeane Garofalo "Hollywood's Sympathy Fuck"

 CNN's Loesch Dissembles In Order To Attack Obama For Pointing Out Booing At Gay Soldier

 Breitbart Blogger: Obama Is "An Ideological Muslim, ... Clinton Was An Ideological Lesbian"

 Breitbart Website Finds Palin Support In Rasmussen Poll That Didn't Include Her

 Breitbart Blogger: U.S. "Open[s] The Doors To Sodomites From Around The World"

 Big Journalism Defends Bachmann Staff, Compares ABC To Nazis

 
I could go on and on readers, as Media Matters For America host over 32 pages, 30 links per page, equaling 960 stories on Breitbart, Breitbart's "Big" websites, and Dana Loesch.

The facts are overwhelming, and it just comes to a point where you say, these two "freaks" are total douche bags and then move on. But since Andy decided to 'retweet" me last night, I thought I'd give my many readers a peak-see at this king of asshats, this king of insane, this king of slimy fecal matter that is teabagger!

"Retweet" by the bottom feeder

Andy was busy last night, as he also pissed off Current TV's Keith Olbermann:

Olbermann Vs Bottom Feeder

At this point in time, Andy's the guy with no shame, no credibility to further damage, and yet a tiny hint of celeb from his Acorn destroying "one hit wonder" with similarly disgraced and discredited James O'Keefe.

Why anyone actually takes this idiot seriously at this point is a mystery to me. Birds of a feather flock together I guess.

Breitbart is the quintessential bottom feeder, and something tells us he was very disliked by his very own parents. He will be the source of the noisy misinformation that drifts into the echo chamber and gets amplified by the next level of questionable "experts" and propagandists - enter Dana Loesch and Breitbart's "Big Journalism" host of talented bloggers. (sarcastic)

So the next time faux news/CNN/ and Dana Loesch radio says "Sources say"...there's a great chance that source is the discredited bottom feeder aptly named, Andrew Breitbart.



NFTOS
Editor-In-Chief
Roger West

Virginia, Its Not Just For Lovers Anymore

Virginia, its "not just for lovers" anymore

Bob McDonnell, and radical teapublican legislators in Richmond ready to ram bills down residents throats.

Radical Red Virginia: Right Off The Cliff

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

It's only been a few weeks since VA's legislature convened in Richmond, and to date more radical ideology and policies have been rammed down our throats this session than the previous 20 years.

If you "Google" Virginia is "not for lovers", you shall see a plethora of reason why Virginia has the reputation it does, which includes laws and bills so archaic that once read - you shall believe that Virginia is still operating pre 1860. So as to keep step with this mentality, radical bills to pass Virginia Legislature in 2012 are:

Virginia Senate votes to repeal limit on gun purchases.

Virginia is to effectively change the state slogan from "Virginia is for lovers" to "Virginia, gunrunners' paradise.

"easier to buy a gun in Virginia than to vote" 

Virginia Senate passes bill requiring women to undergo ultrasound before abortion.

Controversial Voting Legislation Passes In Virginia Senate

Of Adoption, Marriage, And The Virginia Legislature

Bills still on the table for teapublican overreach are:

Welfare drug testing

Teachers' contracts

"Tebow bill'

Sunday hunting

Eminent domain

Here is our lovely Govna dropping a f bomb on a radio show, while campaigning for the Govna's office. Let me just say that the word itself doesn't offend me, the hypocrisy of it all does.

View more videos at: http://nbcwashington.com.

This blog has had over twenty million hits (see below snapshot) in just about two years - with the many of these being repeat offenders or return hits - which tells me my readership agrees with my position, or better yet, they are teabaggers that truly are gluttons for punishment, either way the above scenario fellow progressives are lessons learned, learn to never vote teabagger, for if you do, you truly get what you deserve!

NFTOS registers over 20 million hits in less than two years

My state is moving back 150 years, to a lovely time of slavery, succession, and using rope for belts. Make no mistake, Govna Bob McDonnell is as radical as they come, and we in Virginians have endured a major dose of extremism for sometime from this power grabbing, government overreaching thug! And next up, Ken "hide your boob" Cuccinelli.

Maddow shows us the true Bob McDonnell

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

It doesn't take one long to quickly learn that in Virginia, "hillbillies" and "Rednecks" are major players (circa 2012) in Virginia's strife to remain stuck in the 1860's. In fact, if they could get away with it, Virginian's would love to be still occupied and entrenched in this era.

The CSA is very strong on the "Old Dominion". A old family friends son posts often and frequently on Facebook:

Southern Nationalist Network

and then there are guys like this:

William Robert Looman (Bill Looman III)

and finally:

Constitutional Emergency

In open, most are intelligent enough to obscure these ideals, but then again, some are ignorant enough to not give a shit and openly suggest that Virginia regress to pre 1860's.

Govna Bob promising not to be "Arrogant" and "overreaching."


Yet Gov. Bob McDonnell has disagreed with the Democrats’ and NFTOS' contention that the GOP has ignored the call not to overreach.

Govna Bob also said the perception that teapublicans are single-mindedly pursuing a social agenda has been created by Democrats and, in part, by the news media. The perception is there Einstein because it exists! If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck, then certainly it must be a duck.

Govna Bob:

“I think it’s absolutely false to say that there’s been an overreach and an undue focus on social issues,” he said.

Before last year's elections, then-Senate Majority Leader Richard L. Saslaw, D-Fairfax, told anyone who would listen that if Republicans gained control of the Senate, the legislature would push through a slew of bills related to guns, abortions and voting:

"I was 100 percent accurate," he said last week. "We're on our way to turning this state into another Mississippi."

Clearly the Govna has overstepped his bounds, and its Virginians whom suffer. Why, because the over zealous Govna can only gain the attention of his national radical base by evoking hard lined extreme governing - otherwise his can consider his chances and vision to be Vice POTUS to be nil to none.

Consider yourselves on notice readers - that in the "General Election" in November - there is a high probability that this asshat (Bob McDonnell) will be on the GOP ticket. If this indeed is the case good luck with that!

Before you all start ranting, I have had a home in Virginia for over thirty eight years, and I know Virginia better than most. It's a state rich in history, with beautiful landscape, but also rich in it's attitude and mindset of - backwoods radical pre 1860 ideology.



NFTOS
Editor-In-Chief
Roger West

Red Meat For Their Unlettered Base

Nothing Says "American" Like A CPAC Convention

Much to sell, but little to offer!

CPAC 2012, not just your average idiot in attendance.

If the Conservative Political Action Conference can be expected to accomplish anything more than angry bellowing, it is to reliably embarrass every decent and sane conservative in America. Sometimes the problem is a conspiratorial extremist co-sponsor, like the John Birch Society; sometimes the problem is a certifiable kook giving the keynote address, like Glenn Beck; and sometimes the problem is just vicious bullying of gay conservatives, who have been officially expelled from the conference. But now the annual Washington showcase of the far right is plunging toward new depths of disgrace, by featuring "white nationalists" among its speakers.

And so, a collage if you will, of why not to vote teapublican in November.

Ann "the man" Coulter

Because it's pointed out to me every time she is in front of the camera, I always forget to listen to what she says, and I end up looking at the "Adams Apple" on this "woman". Seriously, we stopped listening to this vile hunk of hate years ago.

Chuck Woolery of "love connection", "we'll be back in two and two fame"

Maybe its best that Chuck stick with what he knows best...... Mind numbing host of 30 year old lame TV.

Santorum

Speaks for itself.

Bachmann

The call her "Batshit" crazy for a reason.

Herman "the pervert" Cain

Rick  Perry:

"In the early years of his political career, Rick Perry began hosting fellow lawmakers, friends and supporters at his family’s secluded West Texas hunting camp, a place known by the name painted in block letters across a large, flat rock standing upright at its gated entrance.

“Niggerhead,” it read."

 

 

Glenn "Conspiracy Theory" Beck

Video streaming by Ustream

Nothing says bullshit, and fear like Glennbeckistan.

Newt-ron-bomb throwing tons of red meat to unlettered teabaggers:

Where do you start with this "anti establishment" diatribe? To much nonsense, not enough time.

Right-wing activist and blogger Andrew Breitbart at CPAC must be under a lot of stress lately from legal battles and having so much of his hard work discredited.  "BEHAVE YOURSELF", " STOP RAPPING THE PEOPLE", "YOU FREAKS". I knew he was F**cked up, but this is overboard, even for this teabagger! Maybe "straight jacket" would suit him best.

Occupiers tell Andy, "Racist, sexist, anti-gay! Right wing bigots go away!"

Mr. Dana Loesch  (Chris Loesch) comes out from behind his wife for once, maybe he does actually have a pair, but the again... GOP Patriotism in the US has been renamed terrorism by NFTOS. (See closing remark below)

I would tend to be more convinced of the "patriotism" by this (Steve Chowder) "American" rapper/comedian (sarcastic) - that is if he wasn't a part time Canadian.

Loesch and Crowder have proved that "white hip hop" is indeed and oxymoron, and that it needs to end...............and end now. Most of NFTOS' millions of readers know I've never really been a big fan of Dana "Diva" Loesch - and I would like to add she's never looked more tasteless than in this video with husband Chris.

Based on these videos, it seems inevitable that the tea party movement will continue to ooze and slime its way from town to town enveloping helpless citizens until – spoiler alert– some brave soul cripples it with a fire extinguishers and drops it off in the Arctic, better yet drop them off at Newts Moon Base!

If you want to declare a winner from CPAC, a good case could be made for Barack Obama, mainly because this movement underscored the degree to which every likely GOP presidential candidate had both serious and major malfunctions.

"in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. ~ Declaration of Independence: July 4, 1776

Translated, "When it becomes necessary for one group of people to break away politically from (the teabagger) another and assume all the powers and rights of an independent people, out of respect for everyone else, those people need to explain why they think they need to break away."

I think the above videos explain everything!

I would tell the CPAC partiers, that even Napoleon Bonaparte thought he was being patriotic!



NFTOS
Editor-In-Chief
Roger West

The Truth About Birth Control

BIRTH CONTROL

Often is the case with teapublicants - facts are often manipulate to suit their audience, or better yet, completely ignored. Take POTUS' birth control stance - "Most of Obama's "Controversial" birth control rule was law during Bush years."

Radical teabaggers have been livid over POTUS' administration rule requiring employers to offer birth control to its employees, when in fact most firms already had to do it!

Teapublicants and conservatives make it really, really difficult for us to avoid focusing on their lapses in intelligence. And with a conga-line of top shelf teapublicans front and center for the 2012 presidential nomination, we're being treated to more examples of buffoonery from these people.

In the last six or seven months alone, there are enough examples of teapublicants botching very basic ideas and facts to fill volumes of "Bushism" style novelty calendars.

What teapublicants once wanted is no longer on the table, for they now have turned coat and backtracked, an ideology they envision, a time when horses were the only transportation mode, where men owned slaves, and when rope was a high fashioned type of belt that held ones pants up.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

First let me say the comment in the video about Rachael and her parents not using contraceptives, totally putrid, but this is the "conservatives" we come to know and love. Second, as always, if it isn't teapublican, its got to be "unconstitutional"! How many times have we heard this theme from camp teabag?  These facts are indeed the answer as to why CPAC 2012 is lobbing hate grenades towards Maddow. But often is case, facts frequently offend the less intelligent. And yes teapublicants, your very existence is why the scientific community created contraceptives - for there is no life guard at the gene pool, so please remember to breed responsibly.



As reported by "motherjones":

President Barack Obama's decision to require most employers to cover birth control and insurers to offer it at no cost has created a firestorm of controversy. But the central mandate—that most employers have to cover preventative care for women—has been law for over a decade. This point has been completely lost in the current controversy, as Republican presidential candidates and social conservatives claim that Obama has launched a war on religious liberty and the Catholic Church.

Despite the longstanding precedent, "no one screamed" until now, said Sara Rosenbaum, a health law expert at George Washington University.

In December 2000, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ruled that companies that provided prescription drugs to their employees but didn't provide birth control were in violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which prevents discrimination on the basis of sex. That opinion, which the George W. Bush administration did nothing to alter or withdraw when it took office the next month, is still in effect today—and because it relies on Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, it applies to all employers with 15 or more employees. Employers that don't offer prescription coverage or don't offer insurance at all are exempt, because they treat men and women equally—but under the EEOC's interpretation of the law, you can't offer other preventative care coverage without offering birth control coverage, too.

"It was, we thought at the time, a fairly straightforward application of Title VII principles," a top former EEOC official who was involved in the decision told Mother Jones. "All of these plans covered Viagra immediately, without thinking, and they were still declining to cover prescription contraceptives. It's a little bit jaw-dropping to see what is going on now…There was some press at the time but we issued guidances that were far, far more controversial."

After the EEOC opinion was approved in 2000, reproductive rights groups and employees who wanted birth control access sued employers that refused to comply. The next year, in Erickson v. Bartell Drug Co., a federal court agreed with the EEOC's reasoning. Reproductive rights groups and others used that decision as leverage to force other companies to settle lawsuits and agree to change their insurance plans to include birth control. Some subsequent court decisions echoed Erickson, and some went the other way, but the rule (absent a Supreme Court decision) remained, and over the following decade, the percentage of employer-based plans offering contraceptive coverage tripled to 90 percent.

"We have used [the EEOC ruling] many times in negotiating with various employers," says Judy Waxman, the vice president for health and reproductive rights at the National Women's Law Center. "It has been in active use all this time. [President Obama's] policy is only new in the sense that it covers employers with less than 15 employees and with no copay for the individual. The basic rule has been in place since 2000."

Not even religious employers were exempt from the impact of the EEOC decision. Although Title VII allows religious institutions to discriminate on religious grounds, it doesn't allow them to discriminate on the basis of sex—the kind of discrimination at issue in the EEOC ruling. DePaul University, the largest Roman Catholic university in America, added birth control coverage to its plans after receiving an EEOC complaint several years ago. (DePaul officials did not respond to a request for comment.)

As recently as last year, the EEOC was moderating a dispute between the administrators of Belmont Abbey, a Catholic institution in North Carolina, and several of its employees who had their birth control coverage withdrawn after administrators realized it was being offered. The Weekly Standard opined on the issue in 2009—more proof that religious employers were being asked to cover contraception far before the Obama administration issued its new rule on January 20 of this year.

"The current freakout," Judy Waxman says, is largely occurring because the EEOC policy "isn't as widely known…and it hasn't been uniformly enforced." But it's still unclear whether Obama's Health and Human Services department will enforce the new rule any more harshly than the old one. The administration has already given organizations a year-long grace period to comply. Asked to explain how the agency would make employers do what it wanted, an HHS official said that it would "enforce this the same way we enforce everything else in the law." 

But it is important to remember that those who are most loudly criticizing the President and his policies are those whose policies and ideology created the economic mess he inherited.

There's a spectrum of anti-intellectualism on the right, and that's a fact. The teapublicants spectrum of ignorance runs the gamut.

Categories or levels of unlettered teapublicants:

Genuinely Smart but Wrong,
Deliberately Ignorant,
Un- or Mis-educated,
Incompetent and Incapable,
Genuinely Stupid.

For teapublicants, education and intellectualism is the enemy of their wafer-thin bumper-sticker marketing strategy, and in so doing they deny their base facts - which has become a matter of survival for the teapublican party.

Teapublicants are welcome to act like idiots as a means of pandering to their dumbass base. Just leave the rest of us alone. America needs more intelligence, and I don't think we can afford to wait for the reich-wing to catch up to speed.

Facts are, 97 percent of catholic women use contraceptives. The 2004 John Jay Report was based on a study of 10,667 sexual abuse allegations against 4,392 priests accused of engaging in sexual abuse of a minor between 1950 and 2002. One priest even abused 200 deaf boys.

This church has no right to telling anyone what to use and what not to use, and for the Holier than thou conservative jumping this band wagon, I say two things to you:

I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ~ Mohandas Gandhi,

I respect those who oppose contraception and thus embrace the alternatives, overpopulation and starvation.

During the time of publication of this blog, BREAKING NEWS from the White House is that POTUS will re-align his administrations rule on contraceptives. Stay tuned!


UPDATE: 2/10/2012 13:07

POTUS Speaks:

"No woman’s health should depend on who she is or where she works or how much money she makes. Every woman should be in control of the decisions that affect her own health. Period." -President Obama

I find fault with all the right wing media outlets - based on the fact they just can't tell the truth. For instance, after POTUS' speech today (noon EST) regarding the backlash from teabaggers and catholic pedophiles alike - these media muckrakers are saying that POTUS "walked back" his contraceptive mandate. That is just not true.

Nothing was actually changed if you read the mandate and comprehend what the President has said. What he did was clarify that women's health care coverage will continue to be affordable to ALL women regardless of catholic church opposition. He actually, used intelligence and tactful demeanor, and told the pedophilia catholic church and radical teapublicants to kiss his Presidential posterior!


NFTOS
Editor-In-Chief
Roger West

DANA " TEABAGGER DIVA" LOESCH AT IT AGAIN

Teapublicant Diva Dana Loesch

CNN's Loesch: Liberals Want To "Tear Apart" And "Control" Your Rights, Just Like In Nazi Germany And "Mother Russia"

I am not sure if CNN's Loesch is auditioning for Faux News, or that CNN is now aptly named CNN "Faux News LITE"




Holy crap, its the NAZIs! We are surrounded! Yes, those Fascist Nazi Communist Liberals, they will destroy us all. Or at least keep Dana employed for a while.

Pot...meet kettle, or better yet, cave, meet batshit.



NFTOS
Staff Writer
Steve "Damn Nazi Liberal" Chevapravatdumrong

Sean Hannity, Intellectual Powerhouse, Or Just Another Idiot?

Hannity proving at an early age that his life long dream and abition is to be a troll

Sean Hannity, yes the same idiot who claimed that every single one of the millions of WMD that Saddam Hussein allegedly had was "smuggled" out of the country and into Syria "completely undetected by the CIA, NSA or the U.S. military - and that's why there were none found after we invaded Iraq.

And research shows that this was:

After Hans Blix and the UN weapons inspectors said there were no WMDs in Iraq, and

Before the White House itself admitted there were no WMDs in Iraq in 2006

So as not to outdo himself, Hannity takes stupid to another level, and Ed Shultz of MSNBC fame is there to point out the insanity of it all.

Shultz PAWNING Sean Hannity:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Typical Hannity, his is not just a liar, he's pathological. Sean is a national pariah when it comes to this type of hype and deceit, (Something Roger Ailes of Faux News encourages) and its obvious that Sean is in way over his head here. This goes well beyond his normal level of anti-Obama derangement.

Sean Hannity's motto:

"Never let facts stand in the way of a good partisan screed."

And you wonder and ask yourself why Faux News viewers are the dumbest on earth?

You don't have to watch Sean very long to know he isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer. The endless lies that spew from Sean are a plethora:

Hannity Lies

"The Blowhard Next Door"


So I ask you readers, is Sean Hannity an intellectual powerhouse, or just another idiot?


NFTOS
Editor-In-Chief
Roger West

LOESCH FOLLOW UP (See previous blog)

Loesch and Martin

Roland Martin has been suspended from CNN after tweeting that, “If a dude at your Super Bowl party is hyped about David Beckham’s H&M underwear ad, smack the ish out of him! #superbowl.” He then insisted that, rather than making a joke about violence against men who are attracted to men, he really just hates soccer: “@DrMChatelain @notjustsexuality well that shows how ignorant you are. I rip on soccer all of the time. Learn to pay attention!”

It’s the second time in a month that CNN commentators have come under fire for controversial comments: Dana Loesch recently cheered reports of members of the United States Marine Corps urinating on the bodies of dead Afghans and suggested that had she been present, she would have joined in. But while Martin apologized and will experience an indefinite suspension, CNN and Loesch refused to apologize for her remarks, and she’s remained on the air.

The clear difference between the two cases? A sense that CNN’s audience was offended. GLAAD, which keeps a careful eye on defamation against gays and lesbians in the media, moved quickly to call for Martin’s dismissal and to track the network’s response to the incident. CNN got the message that its own constituents were upset, and that it would suffer consequences — or at least a lot of annoyance — if it failed to act.

Loesch’s comments on the other hand, offended human rights advocates and decent people everywhere. But that’s not the same as running afoul of an organization with a well-established plan to respond to these kinds of events and a well-worn path to media outlets who would cover and amplify their response. While Loesch’s comments were reprehensible, there was also no organized group who was likely or able to hold CNN accountable for her words, and for continuing to let her appear on-air without penalty.

Taken together, the way CNN handled Martin’s and Loesch’s comments makes it look like CNN has no consistent internal values, and no internal standard for how to respond when it commenters express sentiments that are an anathema to those values. I’m glad to know, per CNN’s statement, that “Language that demeans is inconsistent with the values and culture of our organization, and is not tolerated.” But why should it take several days of consideration for CNN to arrive at that conclusion? If the network’s truly committed to the proposition that violence against gay people is no joking matter, that’s something it should know in advance, and CNN should have a personnel policy in place to determine what the appropriate penalty is when someone violates their standards. Similarly, whether Loesch’s comments violate CNN’s internal values shouldn’t be something that’s determined by the level of outrage outside the network’s headquarters.

The above portion of blog brought to you by thinkprogress.

I found this on a teapublican blog:

"We commend GLAAD for their quick and intensive response to Martin’s attacks, and we commend CNN for taking this initial step."

"CNN now must ensure that all their employees receive the message that “Language that demeans is inconsistent with the values and culture of our organization, and is not tolerated.”

If indeed Martin's comments where and are construed as wrong, then Loesch's willingness to say she would drop trou and piss on dead Taliban certainly falls in line with this CNN Statement:

“Roland Martin’s tweets were regrettable and offensive,” CNN said in a statement published by The Washington Post. “Language that demeans is inconsistent with the values and culture of our organization, and is not tolerated. We have been giving careful consideration to this matter, and Roland will not be appearing on our air for the time being.”

I say, we start banning CNN, sign a petition protesting Loesch's comments - that is until they keep with "policy" - and dump the hack (AKA Dana Loesch) as well.


NFTOS
Staff Writer
Steve "Damn Nazi Liberal" Chevapravatdumrong