Your blogger

My photo
When Roger West first launched the progressive political blog "News From The Other Side" in May 2010, he could hardly have predicted the impact that his venture would have on the media and political debate. As the New Media emerged as a counterbalance to established media sources, Roger wrote his copious blogs about national politics, the tea party movement, mid-term elections, and the failings of the radical right to the vanguard of the New Media movement. Roger West's efforts as a leading blogger have tremendous reach. NFTOS has led the effort to bring accountability to mainstream media sources such as FOX NEWS, Breitbart's "Big Journalism. Roger's breadth of experience, engaging style, and cultivation of loyal readership - over 92 million visitors - give him unique insight into the past, present, and future of the New Media and political rhetoric that exists in our society today. What we are against: Radical Right Wing Agendas Incompetent Establishment Donald J. Trump Corporate Malfeasence We are for: Global and Econmoic Security Social and Economic Justice Media Accountability THE RESISTANCE
Showing posts with label MAGA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MAGA. Show all posts

Sunday, September 15, 2024

"They're Eating The Pets", Laura Loomer, The Stupidity Loop Oh My!

Tangerine Palpatine has Finally Found his Eva Braun


Moving forward on all blogs with Donald Trump - we will be referring to him as Tangerine Palpatine.


The rise of Tangerine Palpatine brought with it a new era of political idiocy, where lies and conspiracy theories became mainstream currency for his most fervent supporters. Enter Laura Loomer, a prime example of how far-right grifters, desperate for relevance, latch onto the Tangerine Palpatine train, embracing a "stupidity loop" that keeps misinformation churning for an audience more interested in outrage than reality. The lie that immigrants were eating pets in Springfield, Ohio, perfectly captures this moronic cycle—a tale so absurd it should’ve died instantly, but instead, it spread like wildfire among Tangerine Palpatine supporters, revealing the intellectual rot at the core of MAGA culture.

The so-called pet-eating immigrants' rumor, devoid of any basis in fact, was a symptom of the broader MAGA disease—a pathological need to demonize the "other" to justify their xenophobic and often racist agenda. Instead of embracing reality, Tangerine Palpatine and his followers, including fringe mouthpieces like Loomer, peddled fantasy, doubling down on fabrications because they knew their audience would eat it up. This is the stupidity loop in action: feed the base an outlandish claim, watch as they regurgitate it across social media, and then reinforce the lie with more lies. Facts? Who needs them when ignorance is your currency?

Laura Loomer, is a deviant fuck, a relentless attention-seeker with a penchant for bigotry, epitomizes this loop. Her career is a cesspool of Islamophobia, immigrant-bashing, and sheer idiocy. She has never let truth get in the way of a good grift, and Trumpism provided her with the perfect audience—people who are not only willing but eager to believe the most asinine, fact-free claims. The idea that immigrants are coming to America to feast on household pets is so patently ridiculous, yet in the MAGA echo chamber, it became just one more "truth" in their alternate universe where Trump walks on water and immigrants are demonic invaders.

This idiocy isn’t harmless. It's part of the calculated narrative that Tangerine Palpatine and his minions, including Loomer, use to manipulate their followers. The Springfield pet-eating hoax was deployed to whip up fear, making immigrants out to be savage threats to American life. But the real savagery is the intellectual wasteland that Trump and his cult-like movement have created, where followers reject reality for the comforting delusion that they’re the last bastion of civilization, fighting off hordes of barbaric invaders. It’s as stupid as it sounds, but MAGA thrives on stupidity.

Tangerine Palpatine, of course, has mastered the stupidity loop. From his claims that Mexico would pay for the wall to his constant fearmongering about immigrant "rapists" and "criminals," he’s built his empire on lies. When a figure like Laura Loomer amplifies these falsehoods, she’s just one more cog in the MAGA machine—a machine that runs on ignorance, paranoia, and racism. The Springfield lie was another tool in Tangerine Palpatine's arsenal to stoke division, and Loomer was only too happy to carry the torch, proving once again that in Tangerine Palpatine’s America, stupidity isn’t a bug; it’s a feature.

The fact that so many people bought into the idea of immigrants eating pets reveals the intellectual bankruptcy of MAGA world. These are the same people who believe Tangerine Palpatine’s election was stolen, despite all evidence to the contrary, and that COVID-19 was a hoax. Loomer, who thrives on the paranoia of these people, knows exactly what she’s doing. She doesn’t care about truth or integrity. Like Tangerine Palpatine, she’s playing to the lowest common denominator, banking on the fact that there’s always a large segment of the population ready to believe the most ridiculous, xenophobic garbage if it aligns with their fears.

But let’s not kid ourselves—this stupidity isn’t accidental. It’s intentional. Tangerine Palpatine, Loomer, and their ilk actively cultivate this culture of ignorance because it keeps their base loyal, angry, and, most importantly, distracted from the real issues. When Tangerine Palpatine rails against immigrants or Loomer spews her bile about Muslims, they aren’t offering solutions. They’re creating scapegoats, diverting attention from their own failures by manufacturing crises that don’t exist. Immigrants aren’t eating pets in Ohio, but why let that stop the stupidity train?

The stupidity loop goes like this: someone like Loomer or Tangerine Palpatine throws out a blatantly false, inflammatory statement, it gets picked up by right-wing media, spreads like a virus through MAGA social circles, and by the time it’s debunked, it doesn’t matter because the lie has already served its purpose. In this case, the lie was meant to demonize immigrants further, reinforcing the ridiculous notion that America is under siege by foreign hordes who don’t share our values. In truth, it’s the MAGA crowd that doesn’t share American values—values like truth, integrity, and basic decency.

Loomer’s career is the perfect testament to this stupidity loop. Despite being banned from multiple social media platforms for hate speech and misinformation, she still found a home among Tangerine Palpatine’s die-hard followers. Why? Because in MAGA world, facts are irrelevant, and the more outrageous the claim, the more likely it is to be believed. It’s not that Tangerine Palpatine and Loomer are misinformed or misguided—they know exactly what they’re doing. They’re cynically manipulating the stupidity of their base to maintain power, profit, and relevance. 

Ultimately, the pet-eating immigrant lie in Springfield wasn’t just a random hoax—it was a strategic deployment of disinformation in the service of a broader agenda. Tangerine Palpatine, Loomer, and their followers are engaged in a battle against reality itself, using the stupidity loop to keep their base in a perpetual state of fear and anger. It’s a strategy that worked for Tangerine Palpatine throughout his presidency, and figures like Loomer are more than happy to continue the cycle. The result is a political landscape where truth is dead, and the only thing that matters is how many people you can convince to believe your lies.

In this idiotic world, it’s not surprising that a rumor as absurd as immigrants eating pets gained traction. What’s surprising is that there’s still a sizable portion of America willing to believe it, proving once again that in Tangerine Palpatine’s MAGA dystopia, stupidity isn’t just encouraged—it’s mandatory.




NFTOS
Editor-In-Chief
Roger West

Wednesday, August 28, 2024

TRUMP (CAPTAIN BONE SPURS) DESECRATION OF HALLOWED GROUNDS

 

Captain Bone Spurs Desecrating Hallowed Grounds


Donald Trump's (Captain Bone Spurs) visit to Arlington National Cemetery, an event ostensibly meant to honor fallen soldiers, has instead become a glaring example of his disregard for protocol and the sanctity of national symbols. What should have been a solemn occasion turned into a politically charged spectacle, a move that not only disrespected the memory of those who served but also flaunted the legal and ethical boundaries that govern such sacred spaces.

Captain Bone Spurs actions at Arlington, where his campaign staff reportedly bulldozed their way into Section 60 for a photo op, have drawn sharp criticism. Section 60 is where the most recent U.S. military casualties are laid to rest, a place of profound grief and reflection for the families of the fallen. By choosing this location for a campaign-related photo opportunity, Trump crossed a line that few would dare to approach. The cemetery staff, understanding the gravity of the situation, advised against such a display, making it clear that only authorized personnel were allowed to take photographs or film in that area. Yet, this warning was brazenly ignored.

This incident exemplifies a pattern in Captain Bone Spurs behavior—a tendency to prioritize self-promotion over respect for institutions and traditions that are integral to the fabric of American society. Arlington National Cemetery is not just a plot of land; it is a symbol of the ultimate sacrifice made by thousands of Americans in service to their country. To use it as a backdrop for a political campaign is to cheapen that sacrifice, reducing it to mere scenery in the theater of Donnie's relentless pursuit of power.

The legal implications of this incident are significant. Federal law prohibits the use of military cemeteries for political campaign activities, recognizing the need to keep such hallowed grounds free from the taint of partisan politics. By proceeding with the photo op despite being informed of its illegality, Captain Bone Spurs and his campaign staff may have violated these laws, showing once again his administration's disregard for the rule of law when it conflicts with their interests.

This disregard is not just about breaking the law; it's about the message it sends. Arlington is a place where politics should be set aside, where the focus is solely on honoring those who have given everything for their country. Captain Bone Spurs actions undermine this sacred principle, demonstrating a willingness to exploit even the most revered spaces for personal gain. It's a move that speaks to a broader issue: the erosion of respect for national institutions under this man's leadership.

Critics have rightly pointed out that this is not just a matter of poor optics; it's a fundamental disrespect for what Arlington represents. The cemetery is a place of collective mourning and remembrance, a site where the pain of loss is palpable, and where the sacrifices of America's servicemen and women are honored with the dignity they deserve. To intrude upon this space for a campaign photo op is to trivialize the suffering of those who have lost loved ones in service to their country.

The reaction to this incident has been one of widespread condemnation, with many viewing it as yet another example of Fuckface Von Clownstick's inability to grasp the gravity of his actions. His tenure has been marked by a consistent pattern of behavior that prioritizes personal and political gain over the values that underpin American democracy. This latest episode at Arlington is a stark reminder of the consequences of such an approach.

In the end, Captain Bone spurs Arlington photo op is more than just a misstep; it's a symbol of the broader decay in the respect for institutions that his presidency has fostered. It's a reminder that the office of the president should be held by someone who understands and respects the weight of the nation's history and its symbols, someone who recognizes that some places and some moments should remain untouched by the divisive nature of politics.

This incident should serve as a wake-up call to those who still view Captain Bone Spurs as a defender of American values. The values he appears to defend are not those of respect, honor, or sacrifice but rather those of self-promotion and personal aggrandizement. Arlington National Cemetery deserves better, and so does America.


NFTOS
Editor-In-Chief
Roger West


Tuesday, July 23, 2024

KEEP CLOSE TABS ON THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION





PART I

The Heritage Foundation, an extreme conservative think tank in this country, has long been a cornerstone of radical right-wing ideology. Founded in 1973 by Paul Weyrich, Edwin Feulner, and Joseph Coors, the foundation has wielded considerable influence in shaping Republican policies and conservative thought. However, its legacy is mired in controversy, from accusations of racism and misogyny to extremist right-wing views.

Radical Beginnings and Controversial Leadership

Paul Weyrich, one of the co-founders, was a radical figure with views that have raised eyebrows over the years. Weyrich's early career was marked by extreme positions, including his infamous statement supporting the bombing of churches during the civil rights era. His belief in using any means necessary to achieve conservative goals set a troubling precedent for the foundation's approach to policy and advocacy.

Accusations of Racism

The Heritage Foundation has faced numerous accusations of racism throughout its history. Critics argue that many of its policies and research papers promote racially discriminatory practices. For example, the foundation has consistently opposed affirmative action and has been accused of using racially charged language to describe immigration issues. These positions have led many to believe that the foundation harbors racist ideologies.

Misogynistic Stances

In addition to accusations of racism, the Heritage Foundation has also been criticized for its misogynistic views. The organization has consistently opposed policies aimed at promoting gender equality, such as the Equal Rights Amendment and various reproductive rights initiatives. The foundation's stance on women's issues often aligns with a broader conservative agenda that seeks to limit women's autonomy and reinforce traditional gender roles.

Extreme Right-Wing Views

The Heritage Foundation is known for its extreme right-wing views, often taking positions that are far removed from mainstream conservative thought. One of the most controversial stances taken by the foundation was blaming parents for the tragic school shooting in Uvalde, Texas. This position, widely condemned, reflects a broader tendency within the organization to place responsibility on individuals rather than addressing systemic issues.

Project 2025: A Blueprint for Radical Change

Perhaps the most diabolical manifestation of the Heritage Foundation's ideology is encapsulated in "Project 2025," a comprehensive policy agenda spanning 990 pages. This document outlines a radical vision for America, characterized by extreme measures aimed at reshaping various aspects of society. Some of the most controversial proposals include:

Dismantling Environmental Regulations: Project 2025 proposes the rollback of numerous environmental protections, prioritizing corporate interests over ecological sustainability. This includes weakening the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and eliminating regulations aimed at reducing carbon emissions and protecting natural habitats.

Curtailing LGBTQ+ Rights: The document advocates for rolling back protections for LGBTQ+ individuals, including opposition to same-sex marriage and support for "religious freedom" laws that would allow discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

Immigration Crackdown: The project outlines aggressive measures to curb immigration, including building more border walls, implementing stricter visa requirements, and increasing deportations. It also supports ending birthright citizenship, a move that would significantly alter the American understanding of citizenship.

Educational Overhaul: Heritage’s vision for education includes promoting school choice and voucher programs, defunding public schools, and eliminating curricula that focus on social justice, diversity, and inclusion. This includes opposing Critical Race Theory and any educational content that addresses systemic racism.

Healthcare Privatization: Project 2025 calls for the dismantling of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and replacing it with a market-based system. This would likely result in millions of Americans losing access to affordable healthcare.

Labor Rights: The agenda seeks to weaken labor unions and reduce workers' rights. It includes proposals to eliminate the minimum wage and restrict collective bargaining rights, shifting power further towards employers.

Judicial Overhaul: The project aims to reshape the judiciary by appointing judges who strictly interpret the Constitution as originally intended, often referred to as "originalists." This could lead to the rollback of landmark decisions on civil rights, abortion, and more.

Social Safety Net: Heritage proposes significant cuts to social safety net programs, including Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. The document argues for privatizing these programs or replacing them with less comprehensive, market-based solutions.

Influence on Republican Policies

Despite its controversial positions, the Heritage Foundation has been highly influential in shaping Republican policies. The foundation's policy recommendations have often been adopted by Republican administrations, including the Reagan, Bush, and Trump presidencies. This influence has ensured that the foundation's extreme views have had a significant impact on American politics and policy.

A Legacy of Division and Backward Movement

The Heritage Foundation's legacy is one of division and controversy. Its radical positions and the potential implementation of Project 2025 could plunge America into a regressive era reminiscent of the 1700s. The foundation's agenda threatens to dismantle decades of progress in civil rights, environmental protection, and social welfare. By advocating for policies that undermine the rights of minorities, women, and the LGBTQ+ community, the Heritage Foundation seeks to revert society to a time when inequality was rampant, and power was concentrated in the hands of a privileged few.


PART II

The Heritage Foundation and Kevin Roberts' Religious Beliefs

The Heritage Foundation, under the leadership of its president, Kevin Roberts, is a significant force in shaping MAGA conservative politics. Roberts’ tenure has been marked by a pronounced emphasis on integrating Judeo-Christian values into public policy and national discourse. His perspective is one that insists on the primacy of these values, often advocating for a societal framework deeply rooted in biblical principles.

Kevin Roberts' Bold Stance on Religion:

Biblical Supremacy: Roberts is unabashed in his lunacy - that the Bible should serve as the cornerstone of American life. He argues that a return to biblical teachings is essential for the nation’s moral revival. This stance is not merely personal but is a driving force behind the Heritage Foundation's policy recommendations. Roberts asserts that the ethical and moral dilemmas facing America can be resolved through a collective return to these ancient texts.

Christianity in Public Policy: Under Roberts’ leadership, the Heritage Foundation does not shy away from proposing that public policy should reflect Christian teachings. This includes advocating for laws that uphold what he views as traditional family structures, opposing abortion, and promoting religious liberty. For Roberts, these policies are not just political stances but moral imperatives that align with his interpretation of Christian doctrine.

Cultural Critique: Roberts is vocal about his criticism of secularism. He believes that the marginalization of Christianity in public life is detrimental to society’s moral fabric. Roberts argues that secularism leads to moral relativism and societal decay, and he calls for a re-Christianization of American culture. This includes encouraging religious expressions in public institutions and integrating Christian teachings into educational curricula.

Exclusivity of Christian Morality: One of the more contentious aspects of Roberts' beliefs is his insistence that Judeo-Christian values are superior and should be the guiding principles for all Americans. This perspective is particularly controversial in a diverse society where many do not identify as Christians. I would argue that such a stance is exclusionary and fails to acknowledge the pluralistic nature of modern America

Roberts’ approach has had a significant impact on the Heritage Foundation's policy initiatives and public stance. However, it has also, rightly so, sparked considerable debate and criticism. Many Americans, particularly those from non-Christian backgrounds, view his emphasis on Christian values as alienating and contrary to the principles of religious freedom and inclusivity. They argue that his vision does not account for the rich tapestry of beliefs that make up the American populace.

One can conclude that Kevin Roberts’ presidency at the Heritage Foundation is characterized by a bold and unapologetic embrace of Judeo-Christian values. His vision for America is one where biblical principles are central to both private life and public policy. While this approach resonates with the extreme MAGA’s, it also raises significant concerns about inclusivity and the role of religion in a pluralistic society.

Van Gogh Jr and Project 2025:

Donald Trump has been linked to Project 2025 through various interactions with the Heritage Foundation and Kevin Roberts. Despite attempts to distance himself, Trump’s campaign and administration have shown alignment with many of the project’s goals, which include reducing federal regulatory powers and increasing executive authority.

J.D. Vance's Involvement:

J.D. Vance, Trump’s running mate for the 2024 election, has been a vocal supporter of Project 2025. Vance even wrote the introduction to Kevin Roberts’ book, "Dawn’s Early Light: Burning Down Washington to Save America," which outlines a vision for dramatically transforming the federal government. Vance’s endorsement of these ideas aligns him closely with Roberts and the Heritage Foundation’s objectives.

Postscript: Separation of Church and State

It is important to remember that the U.S. Constitution explicitly establishes the separation of church and state. The First Amendment states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." This clause is designed to ensure that the government remains neutral on matters of religion and that individuals have the freedom to practice their faith as they see fit. This principle has been upheld by numerous Supreme Court rulings, affirming that while religious beliefs can inform public discourse, government policies must not favor one religion over another or impose religious beliefs on all citizens.

Make no mistake readers, the alliance of Kevin Roberts, J.D. Vance, Donald Trump, and the Heritage Foundation represents extreme right-wing ideology and is a dangerous force in American politics. This diabolical coalition promotes a vision of governance that seeks to dismantle federal regulations, consolidate executive power, and impose a strict Judeo-Christian moral framework on public policy. Their agenda, encapsulated in Project 2025, threatens the principles of democratic checks and balances, religious freedom, and inclusivity, aiming instead to establish a more authoritarian and ideologically rigid state that undermines the pluralistic foundation of American society.


NFTOS
Editor-In-Chief
Roger West